Two documents, two jobs
| System | Document | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Flexible rockfall barrier | EAD 340059-00-0106 (formerly ETAG 027) | Catches and stops the falling block in flight — see Reading a rockfall barrier specification: ETAG 027 to EAD 340059 |
| Anchored flexible facing system | EAD 230025-00-0106 | Presses the face to the anchors; prevents sliding and detachment |
EAD 230025-00-0106 was published by EOTA in June 2016 under the title "flexible facing systems for slope stabilization and rock protection". The document states that the product is not covered by a harmonized European standard, which is why the route is a European Technical Assessment (ETA).
How the system works
A mesh woven from high-tensile steel wire (tensile strength 1,770 N/mm² and above) is laid over the face and pressed to it by spike plates on soil nails or rock bolts. The nail rows are staggered by half a spacing, so the largest local mass that can break out between nails is limited to a width a and a length 2b. The mesh collects the driving forces and passes them through the plates into the nails; the nails carry the load into stable ground in tension and shear. The face is stabilized actively — the difference from a drape mesh, which only slows a block on its way to the toe.
Ordinary wire mesh of the same opening and wire diameter carries 45–50 kN/m in the longitudinal direction; high-tensile mesh reaches 150 kN/m. The difference is what allows the force to be transferred to the nails at an economical spacing. Open meshes allow full re-vegetation of the face, usually with an erosion-control mat under or integrated in the mesh — the hydroseeding step in our service list.
Dimensioning
Two failure modes are checked separately: surface-parallel sliding of the weathered layer along the slope, and local instability between the nails. Both are limit-equilibrium checks with partial factors on friction angle, cohesion and unit weight (Eurocode 7 concept); water and seismic load cases are treated as separate cases. Three tested resistances of the mesh enter the calculation:
| Resistance | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ZR | Resistance to slope-parallel point tension |
| DR | Puncturing resistance in the direction of the nail |
| PR | Shear resistance at the edge of the plate against the sliding body |
Deep-seated failure mechanisms are checked with conventional stability analysis; the anchored mesh is a surface measure.
The five quantities the document declares
- Mesh geometry — roll dimensions, mesh opening, number of openings, connection-clip dimensions.
- Plate characteristics — dimensions and shape of the plate at the anchor head.
- Mechanical resistances — four numbers together: longitudinal tensile strength zk in kN/m, the relative elongation ε in that test in %, slope-parallel resistance ZR and puncturing resistance DR, and shear resistance in the nail direction PR, in kN.
- Connection strength — capacity at the joint of two rolls, zc,k, in kN/m.
- Durability — neutral salt-spray test on wire samples; hours until base-metal corrosion appears on less than 5 % of the surface. Hot-dip galvanized plates are specified separately.
Classes are not design values
The document gives two informative tables. The first groups meshes by puncturing and slope-parallel resistance:
| Group | Puncturing resistance PR, kN | Slope-parallel resistance ZR, kN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | above 135 | above 50 |
| 2 | 80 to 135 | 29 to 50 |
| 3 | 50 to 80 | 19 to 29 |
| 4 | 25 to 50 | 4 to 19 |
| 5 | 25 and below | 4 and below |
The second groups by elongation: A — 6 % and below, B — 6 to 10 %, C — 10 to 14 %, D — above 14 %. Both tables are informative. The group is not an input to the calculation; the calculation needs the measured numbers. Writing "group 2 mesh" in a specification is the same shortcut as writing "MEL class 5" — it makes the offers incomparable.
Where the anchor layout comes from
The certificate gives the capacity of the mesh, not the anchor layout. Nail spacing, length and diameter come from a separate dimensioning calculation that uses the slope geometry, the ground parameters, the water condition and the seismic coefficient; the certified ZR, DR and PR are its inputs. Without the ETA there is no calculation; without the calculation the ETA means nothing on its own. Both are requested together, and the nails are verified on site — see Anchor and rock bolt pull-out testing on site.
Eight clauses for the specification
- The system shall be CE-marked with an ETA under EAD 230025-00-0106.
- Longitudinal tensile strength at least [kN/m]; relative elongation in the same test at most [%].
- Slope-parallel resistance ZR at least [kN]; puncturing resistance DR at least [kN]; shear resistance in the nail direction PR at least [kN].
- Connection strength at least [kN/m].
- Durability: at least [hours] in the salt-spray test until base-metal corrosion reaches 5 % of the surface.
- Plate type and size as declared for the system; mesh and plates of different manufacturers shall not be mixed.
- Anchor layout from a project-specific dimensioning report using the certified resistances as inputs.
- ETA, Declaration of Performance, dimensioning report and installation manual submitted with the offer.
Questions on this topic
Is an anchored mesh the same as a rockfall barrier?
No. The barrier catches falling blocks in flight (EAD 340059); the anchored mesh presses the face to the anchors so that blocks do not detach (EAD 230025). Different job, different certificate.
Can I specify a mesh group instead of the resistance values?
The groups in EAD 230025 are informative only. Specify the measured values: tensile strength, elongation, ZR, DR, PR, connection strength and salt-spray durability.
Sources
- EOTA, EAD 230025-00-0106, Flexible facing systems for slope stabilization and rock protection, June 2016; OJEU 9 December 2016 (Table 4 essential characteristics; informative Tables 2 and 3).
- EOTA, EAD 340059-00-0106, 2018.
- Leonhardt, V.; Roduner, A.: Slope stabilization with high-tensile steel wire mesh, 5th Geotechnical Symposium, Adana, 2013.
- Regulation (EU) 305/2011.